<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dw="https://www.dreamwidth.org">
  <id>tag:dreamwidth.org,2018-12-01:3447659</id>
  <title>princeofdoom</title>
  <subtitle>princeofdoom</subtitle>
  <author>
    <name>princeofdoom</name>
  </author>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://princeofdoom.dreamwidth.org/"/>
  <link rel="self" type="text/xml" href="https://princeofdoom.dreamwidth.org/data/atom"/>
  <updated>2019-01-06T17:04:49Z</updated>
  <dw:journal username="princeofdoom" type="personal"/>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dreamwidth.org,2018-12-01:3447659:9707</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://princeofdoom.dreamwidth.org/9707.html"/>
    <link rel="self" type="text/xml" href="https://princeofdoom.dreamwidth.org/data/atom/?itemid=9707"/>
    <title>tone, accent and word types</title>
    <published>2019-01-06T17:04:49Z</published>
    <updated>2019-01-06T17:04:49Z</updated>
    <category term="linguistics"/>
    <category term="conlanging"/>
    <dw:mood>thoughtful</dw:mood>
    <dw:security>public</dw:security>
    <dw:reply-count>0</dw:reply-count>
    <content type="html">Cross-posted from a conlanging forum I'm part of.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Trying to figure out how to note tone changes in my language Nyango* since it's not exactly like Japanese pitch accent but I'm not sure it would be a normal tone language either. (Maybe I'm wrong on that latter point.) There can be up to two "accented" syllables in a word, 1 fall and 1 rise though they don't have to come in that order. I've been denoting a rise with &amp;lt;'&amp;gt; and a fall with &amp;lt;,&amp;gt; after the affected syllables, but I don't know if that's intuitive to just me or if there's a better way. Dunno what I'm going to do to denote contour tones (high+low or low+high on one syllable) when I have them.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Verbs are pretty simple accent wise. They are either unaccented within the root (and have a pitch fall after the root dependent on affixes), or they have a rise and fall dependent on the word's number of syllables. Verb+verb compounds take the accent of the last element. I haven't decided how noun+verb or noun+noun compounds will go, in part because nouns can vary much more in the accented syllables. But "verb-like" adjectives and "noun-like" adjectives can just follow the same rules as verbs and nouns respectively, so that makes things easy there. Adverbs that derive from adjectives might be a little funky, but that just makes things more interesting.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;*working name&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="https://www.dreamwidth.org/tools/commentcount?user=princeofdoom&amp;ditemid=9707" width="30" height="12" alt="comment count unavailable" style="vertical-align: middle;"/&gt; comments</content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dreamwidth.org,2018-12-01:3447659:6752</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://princeofdoom.dreamwidth.org/6752.html"/>
    <link rel="self" type="text/xml" href="https://princeofdoom.dreamwidth.org/data/atom/?itemid=6752"/>
    <title>Late night conlang musings</title>
    <published>2018-12-19T05:27:30Z</published>
    <updated>2018-12-19T05:27:30Z</updated>
    <category term="conlanging"/>
    <dw:mood>annoyed</dw:mood>
    <dw:security>public</dw:security>
    <dw:reply-count>0</dw:reply-count>
    <content type="html">Should I simplify things by going with something more like the modern version, or have more fun with the more archaic system?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Probably going archaic since the conlang is based on that version. But I also get annoyed with myself when i can't remember my own rules or keep things tracked...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="https://www.dreamwidth.org/tools/commentcount?user=princeofdoom&amp;ditemid=6752" width="30" height="12" alt="comment count unavailable" style="vertical-align: middle;"/&gt; comments</content>
  </entry>
</feed>
